Notice of Verdict on Tilidine Import: Rules for Drug Transport and Legal Amendments
The Prosecutor's Office describes a 16-year sentence. The date of the act and the verdict are necessary for an accurate assessment of the case; transporting medication for personal medical needs has separate rules.

According to Imedi's notice of 9 October 2026, the Prosecutor's Office describes the verdict of Poti City Court, which imposed a 16-year sentence in the case of illegal acquisition, storage, and import of Tilidine into Georgia. The notice refers to subparagraphs 'a' of Article 260, Part 3, and Article 262, Part 4 of the Criminal Code. The full verdict and the exact date of the act are not available here.
Why is it necessary to know the date of the act?
Article 2 of the Criminal Code links criminality and punishability to the law in force at the time of the act. Article 3 provides for the retroactive effect of a lighter law. Due to changes in current drug-related articles, mechanically applying old qualifications to today's text is impermissible. This material does not assess the legality of a specific sentence or the exact applicable historical sanction.
Is transporting medication for personal needs automatically a crime?
Article 19 of the Law on Controlled Substances provides for appropriate medical and customs documentation along with the relevant pharmaceutical product for individual treatment. The Ministry, in agreement with the Revenue Service, determines the rules for transport for personal needs. This regime and the charge of illegal import are distinct legal matters.
A prescription legally issued abroad does not, in itself, confirm compliance with all border requirements. Before travelling, the composition of the preparation, its control category, and the current rules in Georgia must be ascertained. Conclusions should not be drawn from general packaging or trade names. This article does not promise the allowance of specific quantities or simplified customs procedures.
Verdict and Possibility of Appeal
The pronouncement of a verdict, its enforcement, and subsequent appeal are independent procedural questions. Information regarding appellate review does not appear in the public notice; it is not presented as a final, unappealable decision. Without the defence's position and expert examination, it is impossible to assess the quantity of the substance, its discovery, and the admissibility of evidence.
Article 6 of the European Convention, which is binding on Georgia, establishes guarantees for a fair hearing. The notice is important for understanding border rules, but additional documents are needed for a specific person's medical purpose, the final outcome of the case, and the choice of legal wording.
Related explanation: Accusation, Evidence, and Precautionary Measures in Drug Cases.
Verification Date
Legislation verified as of 10 October 2026.
Sources and Legislation
NoticeThis publication is for general information and is not individual legal advice.